Debate Rubric

Excellent

4

Good

3

Satisfactory

2

Needs Improvement

1

Score

Understanding of Topic
You clearly understood the topic in-depth and presented your information forcefully and convincingly.
You clearly understood the topic in-depth and presented your information with ease.
You seemed to understand the main points of the topic and presented those with ease.
You did not show an adequate understanding of the topic.
 
Presentation Style
You consistently used gestures, eye contact, tone of voice and a level of enthusiasm in a way that kept the attention of the audience.
You usually used gestures, eye contact, tone of voice and a level of enthusiasm in a way that kept the attention of the audience.
You sometimes used gestures, eye contact, tone of voice and a level of enthusiasm in a way that kept the attention of the audience.
You had a presentation style that did not keep the attention of the audience.
 
Information
All information presented in the debate was clear, accurate and thorough.
Most information presented in the debate was clear, accurate and thorough.
Most information presented in the debate was clear and accurate, but was not usually thorough.
Information had several inaccuracies OR was usually not clear.
 
Use of Facts/Statistics
Every major point was well supported with several relevant facts, statistics and/or examples.
Every major point was adequately supported with relevant facts, statistics and/or examples.
Every major point was supported with facts, statistics and/or examples, but the relevance of some was questionable.
Every point was not supported.
 
Respect for Other Team
All statements, body language, and responses were respectful and were in appropriate language.
Statements and responses were respectful and used appropriate language, but once or twice body language was not.
Most statements and responses were respectful and in appropriate language, but there was one sarcastic remark.
Statements, responses and/or body language were consistently not respectful.
 
Rebuttal
All counter-arguments were accurate, relevant and strong.
Most counter-arguments were accurate, relevant, and strong.
Most counter-arguments were accurate and relevant, but several were weak.
Counter-arguments were not accurate and/or relevant